<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title> Comments on: Moody Radio Responds to “Standerinfamilycourt” (Sort Of) </title> <atom:link href="https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/</link> <description>Let's Repeal No-Fault Divorce!</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator> <item> <title> By: standerinfamilycourt </title> <link>https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/#comment-8395</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[standerinfamilycourt]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/?p=6430#comment-8395</guid> <description><![CDATA[Recent developments at Moody since the start of 2018, as the Lord deals with its corrupt board of trustees (and as D. L. Moody and R. L. Torrey roll over in their graves). https://world.wng.org/2018/01/moody_blues]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent developments at Moody since the start of 2018, as the Lord deals with its corrupt board of trustees (and as D. L. Moody and R. L. Torrey roll over in their graves).</p> <p><a href="https://world.wng.org/2018/01/moody_blues" rel="nofollow ugc">https://world.wng.org/2018/01/moody_blues</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: standerinfamilycourt </title> <link>https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/#comment-7418</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[standerinfamilycourt]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 18:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/?p=6430#comment-7418</guid> <description><![CDATA[In reply to <a href="https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/#comment-7417">Sharon</a>. Mr. Craig is obviously a marketing man, a PR guy in "damage control" mode -- and a very questionable follower of Christ. The only thing that's going to sway him is getting a significant volume of letters like this. Thanks, Sharon, for taking time to comment.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/#comment-7417">Sharon</a>.</p> <p>Mr. Craig is obviously a marketing man, a PR guy in “damage control” mode — and a very questionable follower of Christ. The only thing that’s going to sway him is getting a significant volume of letters like this. Thanks, Sharon, for taking time to comment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: Sharon </title> <link>https://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/2017/04/moody-radio-responds-to-standerinfamilycourt/#comment-7417</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standerinfamilycourt.com/?p=6430#comment-7417</guid> <description><![CDATA[Mr. Craig had a "blended" argument of adulterous remarriages, which are forbidden by the Lord, and holy matrimony of widows and widowers. The smoke and mirror argument presented by him reveals clearly to us that he is not a theologian, nor a Berean, nor an honest man. Stander in Family Court has not responded to his letter, "It seems likely to further offend him personally to tell him that adulterous homes are not supposed to “survive and (possibly) thrive."]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Craig had a “blended” argument of adulterous remarriages, which are forbidden by the Lord, and holy matrimony of widows and widowers. The smoke and mirror argument presented by him reveals clearly to us that he is not a theologian, nor a Berean, nor an honest man. Stander in Family Court has not responded to his letter, “It seems likely to further offend him personally to tell him that adulterous homes are not supposed to “survive and (possibly) thrive.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>